john keats

Discussion on the works of John Keats.

Moderators: Saturn, Malia

On Why Keats Wouldn't like Wordsworth and Byron

Postby MonroeDoctrine » Tue May 25, 2004 1:48 am

Byron actually had the audacity to write a pamplet attacking John Keats' style of writing hence I doubt Keats would ever respect Byron.

Second point I want to make is that, Byron's Darkness (from what I can remember) lacks irony and metaphor. Last time I read Darkness I realized it was logically deductive, which means his poetry lacked luster. I saw no method of using irony or paradox like our dear Keats.
Peace
User avatar
MonroeDoctrine
At Parnassus' foot
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:11 am

Stop worrying about what other people think

Postby MonroeDoctrine » Tue May 25, 2004 1:53 am

Keatssucks15 you need to know what it means to be a human being, maybe you need Jesus Christ. Try to avoid those televangelist maybe become a Protestant or Catholic or something. Go to church and learn how to love other human beings.

You should also stop worrying about people calling you gay! Who cares what other people think about your sexuality. Be a man and forget about the gossip people have discussed about you it is irrelevant.
Peace
User avatar
MonroeDoctrine
At Parnassus' foot
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:11 am

Byron and Keats.

Postby Saturn » Tue May 25, 2004 11:25 pm

First thing to say is that I am fully aware of Byron's cruel and patronising view of Keats as a 'cockney poet'.

All I can say in his defence is that Byron was reflecting a typical view of the time.

It's important to remember that in Keats' lifetime his work (outside of his friends and family) was not as well known and respected as it is today.

The critics and other more 'upper-class' poets thought of the art of poetry as the exclusive domain of the cultured, idle nobleman who wrote poetry in their spare time without hope or prospect of financial gain, let alone to make a living from it as Keats tried to do.

Naturally they would look down on a middle-class guy like Keats who abandoned his chosen profession for the life of an artist.
He would be seen as an impudent upstart, much as in the same way Shakespeare was looked on as an 'upstart-crow'.

On Byron's 'Darkness' - it wasn't supposed to be ironic - it is a terrifying, apocalyptic vision of the end of the world. Not all Byron's poetry was meant to be frivolous and bathetic!

Just on Keats view of Byron. It's true that in his youth he read Byron and was seen cultivating the 'romantic' image - dressed as a stereotypical poet at Coleridge's lectures.

I never said that Keats ever respected him, just that his influence cannot be ruled out earlier in his life.

Of course when he later read Byon's 'Don Juan' he was disgusted, as many were by it's frankness and profligacy.

However, oddly; Keats and Byron shared a similar loathing of cant - both raged against the niceities of the age throughout their lives.

About Wordsworth - look in the index of any biography of Keats and you will see how important he was as an influence on him. In fact he expresses his admiration of his 'Excursion' as one of the 'three things to rejoice at in this Age'. He met him at Haydon's dinner parties, and in the company of Hunt and Hazzlit.

His admiration seemed to wane somewhat later, but his influence is undeniable.

Also for the record I'm not gay - where are all the girls on this site?
Has love of the Muses deserted their human sisters?
"Oh what a misery it is to have an intellect in splints".
Saturn
Forum Administrator
 
Posts: 3940
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 10:16 am

I wasn't saying you were gay

Postby MonroeDoctrine » Wed May 26, 2004 1:36 am

I wasn't calling anyone gay but I was addressing the brilliant guy that writes under keatssucks15 not you Stephen unless you're schizophrenic and in fact you are that guy keatssucks15.
Peace
User avatar
MonroeDoctrine
At Parnassus' foot
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:11 am

It's not me!!!

Postby Saturn » Wed May 26, 2004 10:29 pm

Please, I'm definitely not keatssucks15.

I think that guy is just trying to wind people up, and he seems to have succeeded.

At least he has got a good debate going, inserting some much needed passion into the debate on this forum.

I've enjoyed venting my anger on him; it's been very theraputic to exercise ones critical muscles, but I'd like to officialy close this topic forthwith.
"Oh what a misery it is to have an intellect in splints".
Saturn
Forum Administrator
 
Posts: 3940
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 10:16 am

Re: john keats

Postby delly » Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:34 pm

This nobody (not in an e.e. cummings or e.d's way) gUy is more into Byron than Blake. And I mean this Byron:

Love and Death

I watched thee when the foe was at our side,
Ready to strike at him--or thee and me,
Were safety hopeless--rather than divide
Aught with one loved, save love and liberty.
I watched thee on the breakers, when the rock
Received our prow, and all was storm and fear,
And bade thee cling to me through every shock;
This arm would be thy bark, or breast thy bier.
I watched thee when the fever glazed thine eyes,
Yielding my couch, and stretched me on the ground
When overworn with watching, ne'er to rise
From thence, if thou an early grave hadst found.
The earthquake came, and rocked the quivering
And men and nature reeled as if with wine.
Whom did I seek around the tottering hall?
For thee. Whose safety first provide for? Thine
And when convulsive throes denied my breath
The faultest utterance to my fading thought,
To thee--to thee--e'en in the gasp of death
My spirit turned, oh! oftener than it ought.
Thus much and more; and yet thou lov'st me not,
And never wilt! Love dwells not in our will.
Nor can I blame thee, though it be my lot
To strongly, wrongly, vainly love thee still.

(Written for Lukas - a young man he met in Greece, where he died in 1824 after joining the Greek revolt against the Turks.)

Homophobia and Ignorance do suck. Keats don't.
delly
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:21 pm

Re: john keats

Postby Saturn » Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:26 pm

delly wrote:
Homophobia and Ignorance do suck. Keats don't.


Absolutely, well said.

Welcome delly. Great first post; the first of many I hope.
"Oh what a misery it is to have an intellect in splints".
Saturn
Forum Administrator
 
Posts: 3940
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 10:16 am

Re: Clear off Keatssucks15!

Postby zebluepenguin » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:07 pm

Saturn wrote
Why don't you take a long walk off a short cliff?


Great! I learnt something new that is not in school today! :D That's very brainy, Saturn. And who's Stephen? This name popped out of nowhere. I have a suspicious suspicion that its you, Saturn. Is it? (Sorry for my ignorance) :?:

And Keats's unccountably loads better than you, Keatssucks15, so get lost and drown yourself. :x :evil:
" Heard melodies are sweet. But those unheard are sweeter." -Keats
User avatar
zebluepenguin
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:27 am
Location: Singapore

Re: john keats

Postby BrokenLyre » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:33 am

My, my, my... when people get so impassioned in their hatred for Keats (or other poets or subjects), I wonder what the real issue is that drives that train... Meaning of words is not limited to just the grammatical aspects of language. There are other factors at work. Context is bigger than grammatical construction. (It helps to keep this in mind when I read any of these threads).
"Come... dry your eyes, for you are life, rarer than a quark and unpredictable beyond the dreams of Heisenberg; the clay in which the forces that shape all things leave their fingerprints most clearly. Dry your eyes... and let's go home."
BrokenLyre
Endymion
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:24 am
Location: New York State

Re: john keats

Postby Cybele » Thu May 27, 2010 1:35 am

Oh, my!!!
This was a guilty pleasure, indeed. I enjoyed reading the discussion.
Somehow :) it reminded me of this:

"Though a quarrel in the streets is a thing to be hated, the energies displayed in it are fine; the commonest man shows a grace in his quarrel.”

I almost feel like thanking keatssucks15 for getting things started. :lol:

Almost, but I don't think I will.
"The philosopher proves that the philosopher exists. The poet merely enjoys existence."
Wallace Stevens
User avatar
Cybele
Calidore
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:19 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: john keats

Postby Cybele » Thu May 27, 2010 1:39 am

And whoops -- if it hadn't been for the spam I would never have noticed this discussion.

I *should have noticed* that this discussion was ages old! :oops: :oops: :oops:

My apologies!
"The philosopher proves that the philosopher exists. The poet merely enjoys existence."
Wallace Stevens
User avatar
Cybele
Calidore
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:19 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: john keats

Postby Macbetht » Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:13 am

Keats gives his readers the opportunity to enjoy the English language as a work of art..
so how such words can be written?? You don't have a right to charge anyone in such a way
Macbetht
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:04 am

Previous

Return to Poems, Odes and Plays

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron